Yearning for the good 'ole days with Saddam
Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller has said that "the world would be better off today if the United States had never invaded Iraq — even if it means Saddam Hussein would still be running Iraq," reports CBS.
Does Rockefeller stands by his view, even if it means that Saddam Hussein could still be in power if the United States didn't invade?It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Democrats are utterly incapable of leading this country.
"Yes. [Saddam] wasn't going to attack us. He would've been isolated there," Rockefeller said. "He would have been in control of that country but we wouldn't have depleted our resources preventing us from prosecuting a war on terror which is what this is all about."
Posted on Monday, September 11, 2006 at 01:29PM
by
Seth Simmons
in posts by Simmons
|
Post a Comment
|
1 Reference
Seth Simmons
in posts by Simmons
|
Post a Comment
|
1 Reference
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to FriendReferences (1)
References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
-
Response: Glamour Photographyhey great stuff
Reader Comments